Multi-Language Development: When to Use Rust, Python, and Java

July 1, 2025 5 minute read

When to Use Rust, Python, and Java

As someone who describes Rust, Java, and Python as my “mother tongues,” I’m often asked which language to choose for different projects. After 18 years of professional development, I’ve learned that the best language isn’t always the one you’re most comfortable with—it’s the one that best fits your project’s requirements.

The Trinity: Rust, Python, and Java

Each of these languages excels in different domains, and understanding their strengths helps you make informed decisions.

Rust: The Systems Programming Powerhouse

Rust has become my go-to language for systems programming, performance-critical applications, and anywhere memory safety is paramount.

When I choose Rust:

Performance-critical applications: When every millisecond counts
Systems programming: Operating systems, embedded systems, network services
Memory safety requirements: When crashes or security vulnerabilities are unacceptable
Concurrent applications: Rust’s ownership model makes concurrent programming safer

Example: High-performance data processing for satellites

use rayon::prelude::*;
use std::sync::Arc;

#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct TelemetryProcessor {
    filters: Arc<Vec<Box<dyn Fn(&TelemetryData) -> bool + Send + Sync>>>,
}

impl TelemetryProcessor {
    pub fn process_batch(&self, data: Vec<TelemetryData>) -> Vec<ProcessedData> {
        data.par_iter()
            .filter(|&item| self.filters.iter().all(|f| f(item)))
            .map(|item| self.process_single(item))
            .collect()
    }
    
    fn process_single(&self, data: &TelemetryData) -> ProcessedData {
        // Zero-copy processing with guaranteed memory safety
        ProcessedData::new(data.timestamp, data.sensor_values.clone())
    }
}

Rust shines when:

You need C-like performance with memory safety
You’re building infrastructure or tools that others depend on
Concurrent processing is a core requirement
You’re working in resource-constrained environments

Python: The Rapid Development Champion

Python remains my choice for research, prototyping, data science, and AI development.

When I choose Python:

Machine learning and AI: Unmatched ecosystem with TensorFlow, PyTorch, scikit-learn
Data analysis: Pandas, NumPy, and Jupyter notebooks make exploration effortless
Rapid prototyping: When you need to test ideas quickly
Scripting and automation: Perfect for DevOps and system administration tasks

Example: Training AI models for spacecraft

import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from torch.utils.data import DataLoader
import wandb

class SpacecraftHealthPredictor(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, input_size, hidden_size, output_size):
        super().__init__()
        self.network = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(input_size, hidden_size),
            nn.ReLU(),
            nn.Dropout(0.2),
            nn.Linear(hidden_size, hidden_size // 2),
            nn.ReLU(),
            nn.Linear(hidden_size // 2, output_size),
            nn.Sigmoid()
        )
    
    def forward(self, x):
        return self.network(x)

def train_model(model, train_loader, val_loader, epochs=100):
    optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=0.001)
    criterion = nn.BCELoss()
    
    # MLOps integration
    wandb.init(project="spacecraft-health-prediction")
    
    for epoch in range(epochs):
        model.train()
        train_loss = 0
        
        for batch_idx, (data, target) in enumerate(train_loader):
            optimizer.zero_grad()
            output = model(data)
            loss = criterion(output, target)
            loss.backward()
            optimizer.step()
            train_loss += loss.item()
        
        # Validation and logging
        val_accuracy = evaluate_model(model, val_loader)
        wandb.log({
            "epoch": epoch,
            "train_loss": train_loss / len(train_loader),
            "val_accuracy": val_accuracy
        })

Python excels when:

You need to integrate with ML/AI libraries
Development speed is more important than execution speed
You’re doing exploratory data analysis
You need extensive third-party library support

Java: The Enterprise Reliability Expert

Java remains my choice for large-scale enterprise applications, especially when building robust, maintainable systems.

When I choose Java:

Enterprise applications: When you need proven scalability and reliability
Large team development: Strong typing and tooling support collaboration
Cross-platform deployment: “Write once, run anywhere” is still valuable
Legacy system integration: Many enterprise systems are built on Java

Example: Mission planning system for satellite operations

@Service
@Transactional
public class MissionPlanningService {
    
    private final MissionRepository missionRepository;
    private final ValidationService validationService;
    private final NotificationService notificationService;
    
    public MissionPlanningService(
            MissionRepository missionRepository,
            ValidationService validationService,
            NotificationService notificationService) {
        this.missionRepository = missionRepository;
        this.validationService = validationService;
        this.notificationService = notificationService;
    }
    
    public MissionPlan createMissionPlan(MissionRequest request) {
        // Validate mission parameters
        ValidationResult validation = validationService.validate(request);
        if (!validation.isValid()) {
            throw new InvalidMissionException(validation.getErrors());
        }
        
        // Create and optimize mission plan
        MissionPlan plan = MissionPlan.builder()
            .spacecraft(request.getSpacecraft())
            .startTime(request.getStartTime())
            .endTime(request.getEndTime())
            .objectives(request.getObjectives())
            .build();
        
        MissionPlan optimizedPlan = optimizePlan(plan);
        
        // Persist and notify
        MissionPlan savedPlan = missionRepository.save(optimizedPlan);
        notificationService.notifyPlanCreated(savedPlan);
        
        return savedPlan;
    }
    
    private MissionPlan optimizePlan(MissionPlan plan) {
        return planOptimizer.optimize(plan);
    }
}

Java is ideal when:

You’re building enterprise-scale applications
You need strong static typing and compile-time error checking
You’re working with existing Java ecosystems (Spring, Hibernate, etc.)
Long-term maintainability is crucial

The Decision Framework

Here’s my decision framework for choosing between these languages:

1. Performance Requirements

Ultra-high performance needed: Rust
Good performance acceptable: Java
Performance not critical: Python

2. Development Speed

Rapid prototyping: Python
Balanced development speed: Java
Longer development acceptable for performance: Rust

3. Team and Ecosystem

ML/AI focus: Python
Enterprise development: Java
Systems programming: Rust

4. Deployment Environment

Resource-constrained (embedded, edge): Rust
Cloud/container environments: Any, but Java and Python are common
Cross-platform desktop: Java

Polyglot Development in Practice

In many projects, I use multiple languages together:

Example: Satellite data processing pipeline

Data collection (Rust): High-performance sensor data collection and initial processing
AI processing (Python): Machine learning models for data analysis and anomaly detection
Mission management (Java): Enterprise-grade system for mission planning and control

# Example architecture
├── data-collector/       # Rust - High-performance data ingestion
├── ml-pipeline/          # Python - AI/ML processing
├── mission-control/      # Java - Enterprise mission management
└── common-protocols/     # Shared data formats and APIs

Language Interoperability

Modern development often requires languages to work together:

Rust ↔ Python

// Rust: Create Python bindings with PyO3
use pyo3::prelude::*;

#[pyfunction]
fn process_telemetry_data(data: Vec<f64>) -> PyResult<Vec<f64>> {
    let processed: Vec<f64> = data.iter()
        .map(|&x| x * 0.001) // Convert from Hz to kHz
        .collect();
    Ok(processed)
}

#[pymodule]
fn telemetry_processor(_py: Python, m: &PyModule) -> PyResult<()> {
    m.add_function(wrap_pyfunction!(process_telemetry_data, m)?)?;
    Ok(())
}

# Python: Use the Rust extension
import telemetry_processor

def analyze_spacecraft_data(raw_data):
    # Use high-performance Rust function for processing
    processed_data = telemetry_processor.process_telemetry_data(raw_data)
    
    # Use Python for ML analysis
    anomalies = ml_model.detect_anomalies(processed_data)
    return anomalies

Java ↔ Python

// Java: Call Python using ProcessBuilder or Jython
public class PythonIntegration {
    public List<Anomaly> detectAnomalies(List<TelemetryData> data) {
        ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder("python", "anomaly_detector.py");
        // ... process execution logic
    }
}

Conclusion

After 18 years in the field, I’ve learned that being multilingual in programming isn’t just about knowing syntax—it’s about choosing the right tool for each job. Each language in my toolkit serves a specific purpose:

Rust for when performance and safety are non-negotiable
Python for when development speed and rich ecosystems matter most
Java for when enterprise reliability and team collaboration are key

The best developers aren’t those who know one language perfectly, but those who can choose the right language for each challenge and make them work together seamlessly.

What’s your experience with multi-language development? I’d love to hear about your language choices and the reasoning behind them.

Interested in discussing language choices for your project? Feel free to connect with me on LinkedIn or email me at cguzwork@cguz.org.

Twitter LinkedIn

Dr. Cesar Guzman